Welcome! We regret to inform you that the Injury Board National News Desk has been discontinued. Feel free to browse around and enjoy our previously published articles, or visit The Injury Blog Network for the latest in personal injury news.

WHO Warns Of Long-Term Cell Phone Risk

Posted by Jane Akre
Monday, October 26, 2009 10:40 AM EST
Category: Protecting Your Family
Tags: Cell Phones, Brain Cancer, Radiation, Cancer, FCC

The World Health Organization is about to release the results of 13,000 surveyed warning  of a link between brain tumors and cell phone use.

LEARN MORE

IMAGE SOURCE: Wikimedia Commons/ cellphone image/ author: Mnoon

In a landmark long-term study, the World Health Organization (WHO) is about to announce that long-term cell phone use is linked to a higher risk of developing brain cancer.

An announcement is expected by the end of the year along with a public health message, despite years of reassurances by the cell phone industry to the contrary.

The WHO survey included 13,000 people in 13 countries. Among those who used cell phones for a decade or longer the researchers found a “significantly increased risk” of brain tumors.

The head of the study, Elisabeth Cardis recommends that cell phone use by children should be restricted, she told the Telegraph, though not banned entirely because they are an important link between children and parents.

Adults need to use hands-free kits and wireless ear devices, the study recommends, though a wireless head set acts as an antenna bringing radiofrequency radiation near the brain.

In 1996, the WHO established the International Electromagnetic Fields Project to investigate the link between technologies emitting extremely low-frequency electric and magnetic fields and human health.

The fields exist wherever electric current flows from power lines and cables, residential wiring and electrical appliances. Much of the research examining long-term risks has focused on childhood leukemia. Evidence is difficult to gather and so far is not considered strong enough to be considered causal.

There were an estimated 49,000 new cases of childhood leukemia worldwide in the year 2000.

The $30 million study results will be officially published before the year’s end.

Emerging reports, some anecdotal, from 20 groups have reportedly endorsed advice that there may be an increased risk of cancer among the heaviest users for one type of brain tumor. Authorities in England, France and India have cautioned against the use of cell phones by children.

Reduce SAR

While the experts debate the merits of the radiation controversy, there are ways you can reduce your specific absorption rate or SAR.

The Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association reports for a phone to pass FCC certification to be sold in the U.S. its maximum SAR level must be less than 1.6 watts per kilogram. In Europe, the level is capped at 2 watts.

Earlier this year, CNN talked to many physicists, engineers and doctors who agreed that cell phones do emit radiation. They recommend ways to limit any potential damage from cell phones near your head:

  • USE THE SPEAKERPHONE - is the most repeated recommendation of experts. A foot or two is ideal for holding the cell phone away from your head and body. Radiation apparently reduces very quickly. Four inches away and it drops by a factor of 16.

  • USE A FERRITE BEAD - if you’ve always been amused by those people who seem to be schizophrenic, walking and talking to themselves until you saw the little mouthpiece on their face, it turns out they may have been right. And a ferrite bead is a clip that you put on the wire of the headset to minimize the radiation coming from the wire toward your ear. The inexpensive bead absorbs the radiation. With the bead it’s hard to even measure the radiation coming off the wire. Following this reasoning, do not put the phone in your pocket or clipped to your belt or you will be radiating your body.

  • BLUETOOTH - while the technology still emits radiation, it’s reported to be at least 100 times less than when you hold the phone to your head. But you are warned against wearing it when you are not talking because it still sends out a signal. Some people prefer Bluetooth to a wired headset, but the fact that you wear it all the time creates the problem. One alternative- switch it from ear to ear.

  • HOLLOW TUBE EARPIECE - Similar to a wired earpiece except the last six inches or so is a hollow tube without the wire under the plastic. You are not receiving radiofrequency waves. Purchase these online.

  • PHONE WITH LESS RADIATION - Are available and they are measures for their radiation output. Check for the specific absorption rate, or SAR. CNET.com has a listing. #


4 Comments

Anonymous User
Posted by Richard Cameron
Monday, October 26, 2009 11:54 AM EST

There is no doubt in my mind that cell phone radiation in dangerous and this report will confirm it, but my biggest concern is that everybody keeps looking at cell phones but the biggest potential problem is DECT cordless phones. I suspect most people were not aware that they are transmitting pulsed microwave radiation 24/7 even if a call is not being made. This is because the original specification called for constant communication between the base stations and all the handsets. This failing has been addressed in some parts of Europe with the introduction of Low Radiation DECT phones. The only problem is that the industry is hiding its head under a stone and hoping it will go away!

Posted by Jane Akre
Monday, October 26, 2009 4:42 PM EST

That's very interesting.

It makes sense- our bodies are 80 percent water. Water is a great conductor of electricity.

Sometimes I wonder why we do the science for safety AFTER the product is on the market. (Guess I answered my own question)

Anonymous User
Posted by gandolph
Monday, October 26, 2009 5:34 PM EST

I'm a physicist and I wrote a blog that compares cell phone radiation to leaked microwave oven radiation. Please check it out:
LINK

Posted by Jane Akre
Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:43 PM EST

I read, or tried to read, your blog and found it very interesting. I'd be interested in hearing what other people think of the science behind it.

Thank you!!

Comments for this article are closed.

About the National News Desk

Our mission is to seek the complete truth and provide a full and fair account of the events and issues that surround personal safety, accident prevention, and injury recovery.  We are committed to serving the public with honesty and integrity in these efforts.

Hurt in an accident? Contact an Injury Board member

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address

Subscribe

RSS Feed

Add the National News Desk to your favorite RSS reader

Add to Google Reader Add to myYahoo Add to myMSN Add to Bloglines Add to Newsgator Add to Netvibes Add to Pageflakes