Welcome! We regret to inform you that the Injury Board National News Desk has been discontinued. Feel free to browse around and enjoy our previously published articles, or visit The Injury Blog Network for the latest in personal injury news.

Stents As Effective As Bypass Surgery, Study Finds

Posted by Jane Akre
Friday, February 20, 2009 2:07 PM EST
Category: Major Medical
Tags: Heart Attack, Stroke, Boston Scientific, Stents, Bypass Surgery, Coronary Artery Disease

Large multicenter trial of stents versus coronary bypass surgery finds risks and benefits are roughly equal.

LEARN MORE

 

IMAGE SOURCE:  Wikimedia Commons/ Graphic- placement of stent / author: National Institutes of Health

 

When it comes to choosing a stent or a scalpel to treat severe heart disease, this study finds that stents are as effective as bypass surgery, with less risk of stroke.

The study is published in this week’s The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).  

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery or C.A.B.G is still the option of first choice for treating patients suffering from coronary artery disease.  Debate has been ongoing as to whether using stents as scaffolds to keep arteries open was a good second option.

The disadvantage of stents appears to be that patients will require some additional treatment.

In this, one of the largest international multicenter trials, 1,800 patients at 85 medical centers in the U.S. and Europe were randomly assigned to undergo either C.A.B.G. or stenting. 

All received follow-up monitoring including the need for repeat procedures, death, strokes or heart attack.

Among the stent patients, there was a 17.8 percent risk of suffering an adverse outcome.  Among the C.A.B.G. patients, adverse events were 12.4 percent.

Both groups had a similar risk for heart attack and death, but the bypass surgery group was more likely to have a stroke with 2.2 percent suffering a stroke, compared to the stent group with 0.6 percent. 

Dr. L. David Hillis, chairman of the department of medicine at the University of Texas Medical School in San Antonio, tells the New York Times.

“What they’re telling us is that these procedures are similar in many respects,” he added. “For individual patients, one is often better than the other. For a patient who can have either one, there are pluses or minuses to each one.”

The research was supported by Boston Scientific, maker of stents used in heart surgery.  #


1 Comment

Anonymous User
Posted by JOAN M. PETTY
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 7:59 PM EST

in 1999, I had my first fatel heart attack and died during surgery when my artery in my heart ruptered. my doctor and surgeon placed me on a heart machine and put 2 stints in the artery. I was left on the machine for 3 days and 3 nights. shocked back to life. Now I have 5 stints one on the right side of my neck because of a block 2 in my renal arteries, 2 in my heart. All because I was taking VIOXX for 5 years. not knowing it was killing my body.

Comments for this article are closed.

About the National News Desk

Our mission is to seek the complete truth and provide a full and fair account of the events and issues that surround personal safety, accident prevention, and injury recovery.  We are committed to serving the public with honesty and integrity in these efforts.

Hurt in an accident? Contact an Injury Board member

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address

Subscribe

RSS Feed

Add the National News Desk to your favorite RSS reader

Add to Google Reader Add to myYahoo Add to myMSN Add to Bloglines Add to Newsgator Add to Netvibes Add to Pageflakes